America’s First Islamic College Opens on Monday

America’s First Islamic College Opens on Monday

August 21, 2010 – Paul Williams, PhD

Calling all radical Muslims and aspiring Islamists.

If you are planning to enroll in the freshman class of the first Islamic college within the United States, pack up your burqa or shalwat kameez and head off to Berkeley, California without delay.

Classes begin at Zaytuna College on Monday.

Zaytuna (which means “olives” in Arabic) promises to be unlike any other institution of higher learning within the country. The name was chosen, the website site proclaims, because olives are a “purifying fruit” since they produce purgative effects.

Only two majors are offered at the new college: Arabic Language and Islamic Law and Theology.

Students and teachers are not expected to be proficient in English but Arabic. This is evidenced by such misspellings as “accredation” for accreditation and “employement” for employment on the Zaytuna website. Click here to read the entire article…

Tweet This Post

Islam is Violent; Not an Idea of Peace

Islam: Not Just Another Religion

By Janet Levy
of American Thinker
December 16, 2007

Text Highlighted below by TCW

This campaign season, presidential candidates seem intent on battling each other with a war of words over universal healthcare, tax reform, immigration, the war in Iraq, the economy and Biblical literalism. Yet, they have spent few words on and have literally ignored the greatest threat to America and Western civilization since the Cold War: the global jihad.

Instead, conservative pundits debate whether we are in the midst of World War III or IV and non-candidate Newt Gingrich voices his concerns in monumental orations, such as his now famous, “Deeply Worried” speech at the National Press Club. Meanwhile, candidates on both sides of the aisle tiptoe around the proverbial elephant in the room as the critical issue of our nation and civilization’s very survival takes a back seat. Aiming for front-row placement, they busy themselves with demonstrations of religiopolitical piety or make strident commitments on either side of popular social issues, such as same-sex marriage or abortion. More discussion has been devoted to the U.S. treatment of enemy combatants and the prison at Guantanamo Bay than the jihadist threat itself. Click here to read the entire article…

Tweet This Post

Americans Too Dumb For China, Really?

Gee, Thanks!

China-Based Outsourcer

Lowers Minimum IQ

Requirement for Americans

By Rob Sanchez

A China-based outsourcing company called Bleum requires that all job applicants for computer science positions have a minimum IQ of 140. Bleum recently announced that it will hire Americans who are willing to move to China—but, according to Bleum, it couldn’t find enough Americans that met its minimum requirements for intelligence. Bleum decided to lower its minimum IQ to 125 to compensate for the weak talent pool in the United States:

“An IQ test is the first screen for any US or Chinese applicant.

“The lower IQ threshold for new US graduates reflects the fact that the pool of US talent available to the company is smaller than the pool of Chinese talent, Bleum said.”

Chinese outsourcer seeks U.S. workers with IQ of 125 and up
by Patrick Thibodeau, Computerworld, July 7, 2010

So the Chinese are going to give Americans a break on IQ because of the smaller talent pool in the U.S. At least they understand our standards of Political Correctness well enough to know that it would be politically incorrect to say that Americans, on average, are not as smart as the Chinese. Click here to read the entire article…

Tweet This Post

Attorney-General Eric Holder In Step With Muslims…

Are Terrorists’ Motives and Ideology Mysterious? Only to Current U.S. Leaders

by Barry Rubin
of The Rubin Reports
reported Saturday, May 15, 2010

If you haven’t read the exchange between Attorney-General Eric Holder and Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas at the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee you should. It is the authoritative statement of how the Obama Administration views and portrays terrorism.

Briefly, Holder did everything possible to avoid suggesting that recent terrorist attacks on the United States had any connection whatsoever with Islam or Islamism to the point that he looked ridiculous. Of course, you’d have to know what happened before you can understand he looked ridiculous [see AP story, below]

I’ll analyze the dialogue and you can read the full text at the end. [Option 1: Go to the end and read it before reading my analysis. Option 2: Watch it on video HERE]

How should Holder have responded?

First, by acknowledging the basic unity of the terrorist campaign rather than pretending there are many diverse motives. Sure, there is the possibility of right-wing violence, but it doesn’t appear very often. And of course there are individuals who are mentally ill or lose control over something (getting fired at a job; a bad divorce) who shoot people, but that isn’t the systematic problem.

If you don’t acknowledge that there is a conscious, orchestrated campaign against the United States how can one possibly deal with it or educate the public about it? Click here to read the entire article…

Tweet This Post

Islamic Terrorism Does Not Exists?

Right, and I have Ocean Front Property in Arizona you can buy.

No Such Thing as Islamic Terrorism?

By Deborah Weiss, May 28, 2010
of American Security Council Foundation

Against President Obama’s backdrop of bowing to the Saudi King, berating Israel, Mirandizing terrorists, and voluntarily reducing US nuclear capabilities, the United States Administration has now made a decision to ban words such as “jihad” and “Islamic extremism” from the US National Security Strategy. But will this cleansing of national security vocabulary be effective in making America safer?

Last month it was announced that President Obama’s advisors will remove all religious terms from the central National Security Strategy document, an instructive document on preventive war strategy. The purpose of the removal of these terms is to send a message to Muslim nations that America does not view them through the eyes of terrorism. The change constitutes a significant shift in US strategy. Under President Bush, the same document expressed the view that “militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the 21st century.” Now however, it appears that in the context of US national security, any discussion of Islam is verboten. Click here to read the entire article…

Tweet This Post

Evil Good; Good evil, the world upside down…

Mainstreaming the Extremists;

Marginalizing the Moderates

By Barry Rubin

Simultaneously, in some far-flung places in the world, several smart people have come up with a horrifying conclusion: radicals are being systematically mainstreamed, real moderates are being declared extremists.

For example, the two semi-official lobbyists for Hamas and Hizballah—Alistair Crooke and Mark Perry—and the biggest defenders of the Ahmadinejad regime in America—Flyntt and Hillary Leverett—are getting adoring write-ups. Crooke and the Leveretts have been profiled in the New York Times. These peoples op-eds appear everywhere, including in the FP (Foreign Policy) blog. Criticism of them seems pretty much barred from the mainstream (there’s that word again) media.

In Australia, there’s an attempt to portray anti-Israel Jewish activists as mainstream and moderate while the traditional pro-Israel groups are said to be extremist. And of course this is what J Street is about: a group headed by a former lobbyist for a company working on a Qatari anti-Israel propaganda group and which itself has hardly ever taken a position supportive of Israel. Could J Street’s cover possibly be more transparent, yet no mainstream media organ ever seems to mention this.

When Hussein Fadlallah, who might be called Hizballah’s founding spiritual guide, died recently, CNN’s chief editor for Arab affairs gushed in all a twitter that she had enormous respect for him while the BBC leaned backwards to sanitize his record.

It sounds better to say someone was an implacable foe of Israel or the United States than that he made virulently antisemitic statements and endorsed numerous terrorist attacks against Americans in which more than 240 U.S. servicemen were killed in Beirut. You see, if people knew this sort of thing they might not like him, or Hizballah.

Mainstreaming may seem to be a great solution but it is the gateway to a much worse situation. For example, General David Petraeus declared on taking command in Afghanistan, “We are in this to win.” But how is the U.S.-led international force going to win? Certainly, they cannot wipe out the Taliban, since the rules of engagement restrain them from doing the kind of thing necessary to root it out. Click here to read the entire article…

Tweet This Post

Kagan lied to Supreme Court in 9/11 case, should be disbarred

Kagan has got to go

by Error Theory

As Obama’s solicitor general, Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan urged the Court to dismiss the suit that our 9/11 families have been pressing against the Saudi government and several Saudi princes for their extensive funding of al Qaeda. The families sued under the domestic tort exception to sovereign immunity, which according to Kagan’s Supreme Court brief (at p. 14):

requires not merely that the foreign state’s extraterritorial conduct have some causal connection to tortious injury in the United States, but that “the tortious act or omission of that foreign state or of any official or employee” be committed within the United States. 28 U.S.C. 1605(a)(5).

The “tortious act or omission” is the wrongful act (the tort) that leads to the injury. Thus she is claiming that for Saudi funding of al Qaeda to be actionable, the funding itself has to have been transacted within the United States. Compare this with the actual wording of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a)(5):

(a) A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case – … (5) … in which money damages are sought against a foreign state for personal injury or death, or damage to or loss of property, occurring in the United States and caused by the tortious act or omission of that foreign state or of any official or employee of that foreign state while acting within the scope of his office or employment…”

Contrary to Kagan’s assertion, the law only specifies that the injury has to have occurred within the United States. Not a word about the wrongful act that leads to domestic injury also having to have taken place within the United. Kagan flat lied about the clear wording of a law that goes to the very heart of our ability to use the courts to combat Islamic terrorism, and thanks to the Court’s failure to review this crucial case, the simple wording and intent of Congress—that foreign states whose actions do injury in the United States can be sued for those injuries—has now been undone, as if the law had never been passed. Click here to read the entire article…

Tweet This Post

No truth allowed in this White House

The Problem Isn’t McChrystal’s Bite

But That McChrystal

(On Administration, not Afghanistan)

IS Right!

Please be subscriber the Rubin Reports

By Barry Rubin

There are two ways of looking at General Stanley McChrystal’s interviews with Rolling Stone magazine: one is to focus on whether he should have said such things, the other is to analyze the important truths he unveiled. Here, I’m going to look at the latter and, following my usual practice, I’ve actually read the article and will base myself on the text.

But first, think about it: the general pointed out the near-disastrous situation with American leadership today. An increasing number of people know that he’s correct in his assessment. Isn’t that what’s really important?

Incidentally, the Obama Administration has been pretty tight about leaks, so there has been less news about infighting and incompetence than usual, not to mention that much of the media has protected it from exposures and criticisms. So McChrystal hasn’t just given us some blunt-worded reactions but a peek into what’s really happening. Click here to read the entire article…

Tweet This Post

New Hampshire Takes Bold Stance!

New Hampshire Fires First Shot Of Civil War

Resolution Immediately Voids Several Federal Laws,

Threatens Counterstrike Against Federal

“Breach Of Peace”

H/T Pat Dollard

Click here for the link to “Pat Dollard’s Jihadi Killer Hour” home page. Click on any of the shows on the player below to listen.

The Betrayal:

The New Hampshire state legislature took an unbelievably bold step Monday by introducing a resolution to declare certain actions by the federal government to completely totally void and warning that certain future acts will be viewed as a “breach of peace” with the states themselves that risks “nullifying the Constitution.”

This act by New Hampshire is a clear warning to the federal government that they could face being stripped of their power by the States (presumably through civil war!

The remarkable document outlines with perfect clarity, some basics long forgotten. For instance, it reminds Congress “That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the law of nations, slavery, and no other crimes whatsoever;. . . . . therefore all acts of Congress which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution are altogether void, and of no force;”

Federal gun crime laws? Void. Federal drug crime laws? Void. The gazzillion other federal criminal laws that deal with anything other than the specific enumerated crimes? ALL VOID. Click here to read the entire article…

Tweet This Post

Ground Zero Mosque must be stopped!

The Radical Agenda for the Ground Zero Mosque is to have Sharia Law in the United States.

If the Islamic fundamentalist Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf has his way, then this just might happen.  Unless Americans are willing to stand up against these terrorists and stop the building of this abomination on American soil, then all one has to do is look to England in order to see the grim future of America.

source http://www.youtube.com/ Click here to read the entire article…

Tweet This Post

Next Page »