Jews Begin Construction of Third Temple in Jerusalem
October 29, 2009 by Roberto Santiago
Filed under Religion
Jews Begin Construction of Third Temple in Jerusalem
Planning New Temple
Satanic “Dome of the Rock” to be removed
by Michael Travis
Jews in the town of Mitzpe Yericho are taking steps for the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem, by preparing descendents of Cohanim (priests) and Levites for service.
At the Mitzpe Yericho rabbinical school, Temple novice priests learn exactly how to conduct the daily Temple service and offer the required sacrifices of doves, lambs, cows, and grain.
Today is really a historical event for the Jewish people,” organizer Levi Chazan said as another part of the school was completed. “It is the beginning of the work for the Third Temple.”
The school will include an exact replica of the Temple. The latest addition to the replica was the area in which priests offered wine and water libations. The water offering was traditionally given on the Sukkot holiday, which was celebrated last week.
Festivities accompanied the completion of another step in the school’s construction. Among those present was Baruch Marzel, long-time Land of Israel activist and parliamentary aide to MK Michael Ben-Ari. The timing of the work on the school is particularly appropriate due to recent Muslim riots against Jewish visits to the Temple Mount, Marzel said.
Some Christians believe that the Second Coming of Jesus Christ cannot occur until the Third Temple is constructed in Jerusalem, which requires the appearance of a red heifer born in Israel. Clyde Lott, a cattle breeder in O’Neill, Nebraska, United States, is attempting to breed red heifers with the intent of exporting them to Israel in preparation of the Parousia.
In keeping with the commands of the Torah, the Jews plan to construct the Third Temple on the Temple Mount in the old city of Jerusalem.
The Mount is the holiest site in Judaism. The Midrash holds that it was from this location that the world expanded to its present form and that it was at this place where God formed man from the dust.
The site is also sacred to the Muslims. It contains the al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock, two of the oldest Islamic structures on planet earth.
How the Jewish people intend to wrest control of the Temple Mount from the hands of the Muslims remains a matter of conjecture.
Related Reading:
- Scotland Has Finally Lost Its Mind
- Anjem Choudary; Christmas Serves the Infidel
- Haiti Repents; America Take Notice!
- Muslims Continually Persecute Christians
- Political Correctness Gone Wild!
- Canadian Students say “No” to Free Speech
- Religious Leaders Gone Wild!
The location dilema of the Third Temple may soon be resolved. Tuvia Sagiv, while flying over the Temple Mount took infrared pictures that later revealed columns, structures etc. underground. The stones had absorbed, retained the sun’s heat and subsequently were visually apparent with infrared. After counting the number of columns, measuring the distance between the columns etc. Tuvia concluded that these stone columns, structures are the remnants of the First and Second Temple, and consequently the true site for the Third Temple. If Tuvia is correct, this means that the Muslims built their mosque on the wrong spot and the right spot is not in dispute. Is this not utterly Divine?
Tuvia’s footage is on the Naked Archaeologist;segment Biblical Epicenter.
Tuvia also has these infrared pics, videos and other evidence on his website.
I think that it will be a great to see the jews build the 3rd temple.
tis a shame to build a temple that will ignite another war? shame on the loss of education in favor of the rhetoric of religion. Christ would NOT be in favor of this.
Christ would not choose to have it this way, but knows that this is the only possible way.
Most worshipers instinctively choose to inscribe something integral of their faith, but Muslim’s have opted instead to inscribe on their Dome of the Rock, “God Has No Son.” They deny Christ is the Son of God yet they sealed up the Eastern Gate at the Temple Mount to prevent His return. Is it just coincidence that the only gate sealed is the one that Christ will use to enter upon His return? It is amazing that they deny Christ is the Messiah, yet believe that an ordinary man (not Divine) has the power to return thousands of years later. More amazing still, they believe that mere stones and mortar can stop Him.
There is other indication that Islam was spawned specifically to destroy God’s chosen people/the Jews and to prevent the return of Christ.
please reference the “indication”. I would find this to be quite an indictment, if you can pin it there.
Walid Shoebat, a former Palestinian terrorist turned Christian, raised in an Arabic Muslim home in Bethlehem wrote in his autobiography, “Why I Left Jihad,” that while studying the Codex Vaticanus/Greek Bible 350 AD, discovered that the Greek characters chi, psi and sigma, which represent 600, 60, and 6 (totaling 666), are not Greek characters at all. Walid explains that as all Arabs read from right to left, he naturally did likewise when he first read the Vaticanus and immediately recognized that what has been believed for thousands of years to be the Greek characters representing 666 are actually the Arab words, “in the name of Allah”… followed by two crossed swords(two crossed swords are common in Arabic and represent war). It appears that the Greek transcribers that copied the original text simply didn’t recognize the Arabic words and in an attempt to make sense of it transcribed what appeared to be the Greek characters; chi (600), psi (60) and sigma (6). According to Walid, what John actually saw was the mark/name of the beast, but because John did not understand Arabic he simply wrote it as accurately as he could. John copied exactly what the Lord showed him, but it was not interpreted correctly because neither he nor the transcribers understood Arabic. It appears that God chose an Arab Muslim turned Christian to reveal the long-hidden mystery of the name of the beast. According to Walid, the beast will come in the name of Allah wielding two swords of lethal aggression, dominance, and war.
Walid’s claim is strengthened by the fact that one of the Antichrist’s names is, “The Assyrian,” which is modern day, “The Syrian.” Many recognize that Islam is growing with alarming speed (the fastest growing religion in the world) and that Syria is now in the forefront as Iran’s closest ally and proxy.
John wrote what the Lord showed him? Seems to me the Lord would have showed him the correct interpretation. Slippery slope. Again – what you write is NOT my Master’s voice.
This is not the sort of thing I think Christ would be espousing. Can you try a little harder to convince me. Or, just write me off as an American who strongly believes that the Mossad did 9-1-1. They are clearly good at getting into nations illegally. But hey, Christ would say – by any means. Right?
The person that I was referring to in, “John copied exactly what the Lord showed him,” was John. In other words, John copied exactly what the Lord showed John… not Walid. So, if you take John’s word in Revelation as the voice representative of our Lord, then it has great validity. If your, “Master,” however, is Allah, then it does not.
As to, “the Lord would have showed him the correct interpretation,” our Lord reveals the things we need to know at His chosen time, at the perfect time, when we need to know them, and not a moment before. It appears that the time is now perfect. Not just because of these few things, but several others, as well. Our Lord says we can not know the day/hour of His return, but that we can know the season. Not only does the Lord urge us to watch closely for His return, if we do not watch significant events closely and connect the dots, we could easily miss the season. I said, “It appears that God chose an Arab Muslim turned Christian to reveal the long-hidden mystery of the name of the beast,” because it is not proof, but indication. However, I find it to be a most incredible indication because the 5 words that Walid read backwards in the Vaticanus just happen to be the Arab words, “in the name of Islam,” and only a person that speaks Arabic and had done the most natural of things to an Arab and read from right to left, could have discovered this. Only a Muslim turned Christian would have opened the Bible with the sincere intention of seeking God’s Word/Truth, and therefore granted the anointing of this momentous revelation. Furthermore, only a diligent, truth-seeking Christian would have gone to the great length of getting his hands on the Codex Vaticanus/Greek Bible 350 AD. It is Biblically required that we not only seek His truth, but diligently seek His truth. This is an amazing coincidence, if nothing else. I personally conclude that it is much more than a coincidence… especially if you take in to account other significant global events.
As to, “Can you try a little harder to convince me,” I must say, with all due respect, that I have no interest in trying to convince anyone of anything. I simply put out, respectfully, what I believe is relevant, and fascinating. It is by His design that He can not be proven. If it were otherwise, then faith would be moot… instead of key.
As to the assassination of Mahmoud Abdel Rauf al-Mabhouh in Dubai, I find it interesting to see that people, such as you, focus solely on the assassination of a well known terrorist and member of the Muslim brotherhood. Mahmoud is the same terrorist that abducted and murdered two Israeli soldiers; Avi Sasportas and Ilan Sa’adon, whose murders Mahmoud celebrated by standing on one of the corpses. In a video taped two weeks before Mahmoud’s assassination, and broadcast on Al-Jazeera in early February, Mahmoud admitted his guilt, boasting that he had disguised himself as an Orthodox Jew. If the Mossad committed the assassination of Mahmoud Abdel, it was in retaliation for the lives of the two soldiers. I do not believe this is a justification, since the sacrifice of Christ requires that we turn the other cheek and forgive, but it certainly indicates that there is blood on the hands of Muslims and Jews alike… and in Mahmoud’s case, at least twice as much. Without placing responsibility of the assassination on Israel yet, since it is not at all conclusive, but based on biased speculation, I do not believe that Israel is innocent, but neither are the Palestinians/Hamas innocent… far from it. Perhaps this is why the Bible reveals that 2/3 of all the Jews in Israel will be destroyed, as well as 85% of all Middle Eastern Muslims. Therefore, I have little interest in the deaths of terrorists, and am not entirely sympathetic with Israel. However, I continue to pray for Muslims and Jews, and ask that God be merciful because I recognize that every life has value, as they are also God’s very own.
As to, “They are clearly good at getting into nations illegally,”… if you are referring to those that used false passports to commit the Mahoud Abel assassination, this is very common in such endeavors, and hardly the first, nor last, to use illegal means to reach their murderous objectives.
It is hurtful to read your words, “But hey, Christ would say – by any means. Right?” because the name of Christ is Holy, should not be so lightly evoked, and is the greatest symbol of forgiveness the world has ever known.
again- you are of the “politicians of religion”. you remind ME of the Pharasees. Read what Jesus said, and it is a long interpretation to what you state. the church needs money and power, and – as example, the church in america works hand in hand with the gov’t. How? by talking the talk, that keeps us calm, we are good worker bees. By churches that go outside of the doctrine of what is reasonable – such as questioning 911, terrorists, etc, – the govt comes in and threatens to rescind the tax free status.
Jesus is not for the Jews, the Muslims, the Christians – Jesus is not political in any way. Jesus is about something that the bible does not grasp. He is about love, and it is not about the Promised land. This is not necessary. It may come to be, but God does not need this to happen. After all – he is God. It would only be the limitations of humanity that might create this to be so. But, God need this – NO.
Jesus did away with many of the laws of the day, and there absolutely was a NEW covenant. However – too many Christians are really just, “Zionist Christians”. And, do not get it. Jesus was not suddenly consumed with “LAW” of the Pharasees after the resurection.
Again – not my Master’s voice. The convention of the first vatican really messed up the message.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/mex.html
you only seem to care about the muslim terrorists – why you do not turn the other cheek? Seems you only license one side to be terrorists , and that side invented it. They perfected it. You see – you cannot be in Gods grace by worshipping the Jew, by trying to love the Jews and whatever means they employ. You are simply being a goupie for GOD, and not really what God wants at all.
You are why mankind has fought for all these millenia. I pity you and your ilk. Over and out.
Your points are scattered, weak, and irrelevant to the discussion. It appears that you are so used to spouting off the same lines automatically that you go into the same old tired rant without acknowledging the substance of the conversation. I didn’t say a single thing about politics, the church, money, power, taxes, 911, worker bees (I assume this is a reference to social injustice), nor terrorists. The Mossad was the first instance of your scattered, disconnected thought process… as I only addressed it because you brought it up. Furthermore, I said that the accusation against Israel in the assassination of terrorist Abdel Rauf al-Mabhouh is not YET conclusive. Does this not give you a clue that I believe Israel may be exposed after further investigation? Again, it was you who injected terrorists, although irrelevant to the discussion until you brought it up. You say that I don’t turn the other cheek when it comes to Muslim terrorists, although I said that I pray for both Muslims and Jews. So, again, you are just shooting off automatically without acknowledging that was actually said, and not said. You said I worship the Jew although I said that the Jews also have blood on their hands. I see other problems with the Jews, but bringing them up at that time would have been off topic. I kept to the points you made and addressed them exclusively and in chronological order, but I see that to ask likewise is beyond your capability.
I have to dismiss you as a simple thing that is coping, as well as you can, with the blinding bitterness of personal economic failure. This bitterness is indicated in how you shoot off about social injustice, taxes etc. whether it is relative to the conversation, or not… and so, further discussion is pointless. I wish you well. God be with you.
Thank you. I do feel God is with me. I do feel you are an expert in Straw Man arguments and logic. Seeming to think that I have attained less than gracious economic renumeration in my life?
You are very “bright” with your wordsmith, but – let me remind – taking the name of the lord in vain is a very complicated matter. I could define that you have done it brilliantly.
As far as mention of Terrorists – I was responding to the descriptions you use. Not sure I insulted you personally. You have been very eloquent at doing it to me.
So, I do not trust your sign-off as being sincere. Again, another example of the Lord’s name in vain.
This is my final post. Study up on some simple logic and semantic classes. They would serve you well. You already are quite adept at the volume of your tone.